:>: -----Original Message----- :>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On :>: Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin :>: Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:38 PM :>: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU :>: Subject: Re: SMP/E question :>: :>: On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:48:30 -0800, retired mainframer wrote: :>: :>: >I have not tried the exact combination of SRC and MAC with the same :>: name but :>: >as far back as 1995 (MVS/ESA 4.3) I have used various DATAx with the :>: same :>: >name as a MAC, SRC, PROC, SAMP, etc with no apparent conflict. :>: > :>: >In any event, the ++LMOD control statement supports up to two DD names :>: in :>: >the SYSLIB operand. Between that and ++JCLIN control cards, you should :>: have :>: >no trouble generating the two versions you want. :>: > :>: I find no ++LMOD MCS mentioned in the TOC of: :>: :>: Title: SMP/E V3R6.0 for z/OS V1R13.0 Reference :>: Document Number: SA22-7772-16
Yes, my bad. It is not the non-existent ++LMOD MCS but the description of the LMOD data set entry in chapter 5. :>: Are you thinking, perhaps of UCLIN to define LMOD entries in :>: :>: Title: SMP/E V3R6.0 for z/OS V1R13.0 Commands :>: Document Number: SA22-7771-15 :>: :>: ??? :>: :>: And while either UCLIN or ++JCLIN may define up to two SYSLIB (target :>: library) subentries in an LMOD entry, I see no way that the the two load :>: modules may have different content or attributes, which is what Phil :>: requires. Since JCLIN supports multiple job steps (chapter 9 of this reference), there is no problem having two LKED steps with different SYSLMOD DD statements and/or with different NAME/ALIAS control cards. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
