>Let me back it up a level: what's the problem you're trying to solve? Are >you trying to make things more user-friendly? I submit that the >unpredictability this introduces would have the opposite effect.
This is the kind of reaction that I am waiting for, pointing to things that need to be answered rather than sticking with the existing model(s). I admit of not thinking the dis-ambiguity model through all the way yet (this conversation is my first attempt of expressing the issue). And unpredictability is for sure a show stopper. I will think about it and I ask anybody who may view this ideas as positive to think about it as well. Thanks ZA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
