In
<caarmm9rzepkzt2z1eb2rqcjxeildu75-9bxjbkeech++ay1...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 02/19/2014
at 02:43 PM, Tony Harminc <[email protected]> said:
>"No" what?
No, that is not how conditional branching in channel programs has
always worked.
>I think we need a counter for your yearly use of this cliché,
I think we need a counter for people claiming that what they are
familiar with is the way that things have always been. Quadword?
>I didn't suggest, let alone say, anything counter to this.
Then who wrote "Indeed this is the way conditional execution and
branching works (and has always worked) in channel programs."?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
