John Eells wrote: >One or two people at the past SHARE voiced this very same opinion. Let's say, >for the sake of argument, that that's four so far. How do others feel about >this?
Thanks John for joining this discussion. While this list is not a formal discussion list, at least it is good that you and others are monitoring this. >First, some background: As I recall, the current design of the ServerPac >dialog does not allow space to be reduced below the default shipped values, >which with a few exceptions include a fixed percentage of free space. True. >a) We might blanket increase the free space for every data set. (In this >case, by how much should we increase it?) This one has the benefit of being >easier than the others, I suspect. Could work, but product sizes differ. >e) We might do something else...what? Making space for usermods + exits themselves and the APPLY processes? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
