I can't think of any reason, other than the kajority of shops don't do development in UNIX directories, using make. So I asking if there is any reason, other than "we've always used PDS libraries for source and JCL to compile." I msy sldo look into creating a DLL, or shared library. On Jun 8, 2014 10:11 AM, "Paul Gilmartin" < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 10:00:38 -0500, John McKown wrote: > > >..., is there any compelling reason that I should > >create a source PDSE and an JCL PDS for compiling the source in the PDS? > > > Why? Can't HLASM and the compiler(s) deal with source in UNIX > directories? And you can view UNIX directories with UDLIST, > edit members with ISPF Edit, and SUBMIT them, etc. > > Even (perhaps unsupported, but I do it) put UNIX directories in > your SYSEXEC concatenation, and execute Edit macros from > them. Restriction: the first catenand must be a PDS(E), not > a UNIX directory. > > Is CP 1047 a problem? > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
