On 6/8/2014 12:50 PM, Rob Schramm wrote:
I think it is needed. I was doing some assembler work and wanted to store
source in zUnix.. no joy.
Can you be more specific? What kind of problems did you encounter?
I've successfully assembled and bound assembler code under z/OS UNIX
using 'c89', 'as', and 'ld' in various combinations.
-Steve Comstock
It is annoying to have source with suffix like .asm and have to store it in
a pds without it. Bleh!!
Rob Schramm
On Jun 8, 2014 11:11 AM, "Paul Gilmartin" <
[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 10:00:38 -0500, John McKown wrote:
..., is there any compelling reason that I should
create a source PDSE and an JCL PDS for compiling the source in the PDS?
Why? Can't HLASM and the compiler(s) deal with source in UNIX
directories? And you can view UNIX directories with UDLIST,
edit members with ISPF Edit, and SUBMIT them, etc.
Even (perhaps unsupported, but I do it) put UNIX directories in
your SYSEXEC concatenation, and execute Edit macros from
them. Restriction: the first catenand must be a PDS(E), not
a UNIX directory.
Is CP 1047 a problem?
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
