I think it is needed. I was doing some assembler work and wanted to store source in zUnix.. no joy.
It is annoying to have source with suffix like .asm and have to store it in a pds without it. Bleh!! Rob Schramm On Jun 8, 2014 11:11 AM, "Paul Gilmartin" < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 10:00:38 -0500, John McKown wrote: > > >..., is there any compelling reason that I should > >create a source PDSE and an JCL PDS for compiling the source in the PDS? > > > Why? Can't HLASM and the compiler(s) deal with source in UNIX > directories? And you can view UNIX directories with UDLIST, > edit members with ISPF Edit, and SUBMIT them, etc. > > Even (perhaps unsupported, but I do it) put UNIX directories in > your SYSEXEC concatenation, and execute Edit macros from > them. Restriction: the first catenand must be a PDS(E), not > a UNIX directory. > > Is CP 1047 a problem? > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
