I have just reread Gordon Moore's original 1965 formulation of his eponymous law; and it is my guess that it has proved to be so protean in large part because it can be interpreted in many different, loosely related ways.
An algebraic formulation with dimensioned elements would spoil all the fun. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
