Right: The conflation of miscellaneous "speed up" techniques is probably what keeps it going. As I present it's going to take more from installations / app maintainers to keep it effectively going - as there'll be less from chip- and system-makers (in all likelihood).
Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: John Gilmore <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 10/06/2014 00:10 Subject: Re: Demonstrating Moore's law Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> I have just reread Gordon Moore's original 1965 formulation of his eponymous law; and it is my guess that it has proved to be so protean in large part because it can be interpreted in many different, loosely related ways. An algebraic formulation with dimensioned elements would spoil all the fun. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
