On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 19:10:51 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
>I have just reread Gordon Moore's original 1965 formulation of his
>eponymous law; and it is my guess that it has proved to be so protean
>in large part because it can be interpreted in many different, loosely
>related ways.
>
>An algebraic formulation with dimensioned elements would spoil all the fun.
>
Example:
http://xkcd.com/1204/
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
