As I made clear in an earlier post, the specification of both REFR and RENT to the binder is inappropriate. For it, specifying REFR implies that both RENT and REUS are in effect, and specifying, say REFR,NORENT will first yield
REFR and then since REFR implies RENT and RENT implies REUS, all of REFT, RENT, and REUS are in effect. Much of the other behavior of the binder, notably its handling of aliases and their lengths is very different from that of the linkage editor, which should long since have been given a decent burial. -- John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
