On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 19:16:36 -0400 Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
:>>Which technically is wrong :>I disagree a bit. It does not hurt to add indicators of things that are :>subsets. A refreshable module, if treated as reentrant, will work (the :>converse not being true, of course). A refreshable module, if treated as :>serially reusable will work. Not true. Just because the module does not self modify, does not mean that it properly serializes access to other storage. :>>Not that I've ever read, and the last I looked :>>the linkage editor can still create that combination. :>There is no reason I can think of why this should be in something that you :>"read". You can specify just REFR if you choose. What the system (binder :>in this case) chooses to set when that is done is "our business" and it :>happens to be that it sets REFR, RENT, and REUS. :>It appears, similarly, that when you specify "RENT" (without REFR) the :>binder applies the REUS attribute as well (I didn't check that out for :>real, but the binder output shows that REUS is YES when the parm has just :>RENT). That is proper, because reentrancy does not limit to at the same time. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
