Don't you do a System Reset??? Look at the instructions of IXC102A, or chapter 
in Upsetting a sysplex;-): 8.9  Removing a system from the Sysplex.

Kees.


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Herring, Bobby
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 21:21
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: V xcf clarification

Does it need to be done? When we IPL, we just bring everything down as noted 
and then do the load. The LPAR gets removed and reconnected to the plex and all 
seems to work well.

We've never done the V XCF command.

Bobby Herring
Texas Farm Bureau Insurance

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Ronald Kristel
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 2:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] V xcf clarification

I cannot really think of a specific reason why it SHOULD be done on another 
member in the sysplex.
Assuming that you have brought the system down in a clean way (stopped all 
subsystems, etc..), It sounds like a trouble  to get on a local terminal or HMC 
to issue the V XCF, OFFLINE to vary itself down.
Issueing V XCF, OFFLINE results in message IXC371D anyway. Much easier to just 
issue the command on another system of that sysplex and replying at IXC371D to 
vary the system out of the sysplex.

Again, I personally can not come up with a reason why this is done normally.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Ronald Kristel


> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 23:29:48 +0530
> From:
> Subject: V xcf clarification
> To: [email protected]
>
> Hi ,
>
> Our IPL procedure says to issue v xcf offline from a active in the 
> same plex. Its like dt01 is being ipled but v xcf, offline sys=dt01 
> from a active lpar dt02. This is being done on CF bases plex.Is there 
> any specific reason for issuing v xcf offline from a active system ?
>
> Pete
[http://infonet.txfb-ins.com//images//email.gif]
WWW.TXFB-INS.COM<http://www.txfb-ins.com>

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The foregoing message (including attachments) is 
covered by the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 
2510-2521, and is CONFIDENTIAL. If you believe that it has been sent to you in 
error, do not read it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have 
received the message in error, then delete it. Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************
                        

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to