Well, there are structures with a disposition of delete, which will be recreated by the first connect to them. But indeed, there should be no reason why one lpar can better create them than another.
Kees. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jousma, David Sent: 05 December, 2014 15:17 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LPAR IPL order within a Sysplex I guess I am missing something. Unless the CF's are being recycled, there are no structures to be (re)built. And even so, all lpars should be using the same policy, not even sure NOT using the same policy is an option. _________________________________________________________________ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering ******************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ******************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
