On 7 April 2015 at 15:52, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > I once looked into ADRDSSU as an interchange vehicle. I stumbled on a > statement in the Manual that the recipient (if renaming) must have READ > access to the original DSN. This seems supremely stupid to me; READ > access to the archive should suffice. But when I criticize ADRDSSU in > this forum, the consensus reply is that only storage administrators should > be using ADRDSSU at all and since I'm not a storage administrator I don't > get a vote.
There is at least one ADRDSSU-compatible program (in CBT file 860) that doesn't enforce the silly aspects of access checking. Yeah, I know - no one wants to run CBT stuff in production. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
