And if whatever reason, the tersed data set gets truncated, the unterse should not end normally. And validity checking would be nice too, checksum or whatever.
--- [email protected] wrote: From: Barry Merrill <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AMATERSE and PDSE ? Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:47:17 -0500 It would also be nice if the TERSE told you that you had attempted to TERSE an SMF file that had been created by IFASMFDP with its (STUPID!) default LRECL=32767, which doesn't bother TERSE, but then causes UNTERSE to fail because the record length is too long, so you have to go back and re-dump with the correct LRECL=32760 and then TERSE/UNTERSE will work. Barry Merrill -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AMATERSE and PDSE ? On 2015-04-07, at 15:04, Anthony Fletcher wrote: > The documentation clearly says that AMATERSE does not support Program > Objects in a PDSE but has anyone tried raising a PMR to get this > caught at TERSE time rather than at UNTERSE time? > Perhaps the TERSE is allowed in anticipation that some future enhancement to AMATERSE will allow the archive to be UNTERSEd. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN _____________________________________________________________ Netscape. Just the Net You Need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
