>>It's just that while it has the IEF238D outstanding, you cannot vary 
>>consoles. 

>Thanks. After RTFM, now I see the whole story. Interesting, perhaps you 
>discovered a bug. I wonder what would IBM's response on> >this.

Going to start off by saying I was throwing a lot of terms around in the wrong 
ways in my last message (haste is not always good), but I hope everyone got the 
gist of it.

Can't know for sure it's a bug. There might be a very good reason why an 
exclusive ENQ is necessary, but I don't see it. Especially considering it's 
apparently not necessary for similar operations...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to