>Can't know for sure it's a bug. There might be a very good reason why an >exclusive ENQ is necessary, but I don't see it. Especially considering it's >apparently not necessary for similar operations...
If you don't mind the effort, open a PMR, describe the situaiton including the ENQ contention you see and ask why it is necessary. I'm sure, IBM will look into this and maybe find out that the exclusive ENQ in not needed. Or maybe it is needed, but then they should explain why, so we can understand another bit of it. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
