On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:09:32 -0500, Roland Kinsman <[email protected]> wrote:
>Thanks for quick replies. > >I'll look into using ATTACHMVS instead of CALL, or find a way to add logoff >into the loop. That one looks very promising if I can pull it off. > >I'm calling both programs using TSOEXEC CALL *(xxx). Your use of TSOEXEC rather than a simple address TSO suggests that the programs run APF-authorized. If that's true, ATTACHMVS won't work for you. However, since you are running them using TSO CALL command, your programs are already being ATTACHed. Therefore using ATTACHMVS would not give any added benefit in terms of storage cleanup. I think you'll need to get a dump and figure out what storage isn't being freed. -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
