On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:02:08 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:54:29 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote: >> >>Your use of TSOEXEC rather than a simple address TSO suggests that the >>programs run APF-authorized. If that's true, ATTACHMVS won't work for you. >> >Doesn't CALL do an authorized ATTACH when needed? >(I don't understand TSOEXEC.) No, it doesn't, if I remember correctly. That's the only reason I know of to use TSOEXEC to invoke CALL. -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
