From memory (15+ years ago), lack of control over DASD space allocation
and CSI configuration.
R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2015-09-15 o 20:40, CM Poncelet pisze:
Yes, I would agree. CBPDO and any other native SMP/E installs are
faster and more user-controllable than 'PAC' ones. CP
What kind of control do you lack in ServerPac???
BTW: Quotation from IBM course ES41 z/OS Installation:
"However, the CBPDO installation is more complex to plan, more complex
to run, and after installation, the customer is responsible for
performing migration tasks to ensure that other system components that
are maybe not upgraded by CBPDO are compatible with the z/OS system."
and
"Most customers are using ServerPac to upgrade existing z/OS systems,
rather than upgrading their systems using CBPDO."
I agree with both statements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
