On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:18:39 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >IBM also has rules (published following the Neon Systems legal action >a few years ago) that describe what workloads IBM allows to be run on >the various kinds of processors: >http://www-947.ibm.com/systems/support/machine_warranties/machine_code/aut.html >And, like Facebook, they get to change the rules any time they want. > Of course it depends on what IBM and the ISV notice. Things can slip through the cracks. To wit: IO11698 5 years ago which whitewashed (not repaired) a side-door integrity exposure, now pretty well described in a Users Guide, that may have persisted for years or decades without IBM' s noticing.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
