You are not alone, but this request has not prevailed. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 11:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: COBOL v5 At 10:00 -0700 on 01/25/2016, Frank Swarbrick wrote about Re: COBOL v5: >The one reason I know of what a PDSE is required is because TEST/DEBUG >information is now stored in a DWARF NOLOAD segment, and those are only >supported by PDSE (or UNIX directory). So have a compile time switch to put them where-ever that go in a pre-V5 compile. This seems to be a unneeded forced requirement to go PDSE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
