For confusion's sake, the 2000s have three meanings.
The two hundredth one decade since CE: 200x,
The twenty first century since CE:20xx,
and the third millennium since CE: 2xxx.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Joel C. Ewing <[email protected]> wrote:
> The recognized punctuation rules are no longer black and white where z13
> and z13s are involved.  The rule of always using an apostrophe for
> plurals of "non-words" is no longer universal:
>
> One rule is apostrophe "s" is used for plural for "words" that are not
> normally a noun; but z13 in our context is normally a noun, so by that
> standard the plural could be just z13s.
>
> When multi-digit numbers are made into a plural, it is now acceptable to
> use just "s" for plural, as in both 1990's and 1990s being in common use
> for multiple years in that decade -- again by that standard, z13s could
> be a plural of z13.
>
> And of course, if you want a possessive form, like "the z13's frame",
> then the apostrophe is required, which is very confusing if you also
> demand the apostrophe for a plural.
>
> All in all, "z13s" as a distinct machine type introduces ambiguity that
> could easily have been avoided.  It was not an astute choice.
>     Joel C. Ewing
>
> On 02/18/2016 07:57 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> Maybe right:
>>
>> z13 is a single z13
>> z13's is more than one z13
>> z13s is a single z13s
>> z13s' is more than one z13s
>> z13* or z13x is one or more z13*'s or z13x's
>>
>> where x or * is any char including null
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 3:30 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>>> -------------SNIP---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>> 4. IBM has greatly relaxed the data center environmental requirements for
>>>> this model, expanding the temperature and humidity envelopes. It's much
>>>> more realistic now to install the z13s in nontraditional data centers, or
>>>> even places that aren't really data centers. Platforms that move, for
>>>> example, or out in remote facilities. (In technobabble it's an ASHRAE
>>>> class
>>>> A3 system now instead of class A2.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------SNIP---------------------------
>>> Timothy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update
>>> -------------WAR STORY TIME--------------------------------------------
>>> I worked at one place that used a ware house type environment to do DR.
>>> That is they bought a new machine in their DC and disassembled the old
>>> machine and put it in the ware house.
>>> Some how they expected the old machine could do DR. Periodically they
>>> would send a sysprog off to the DR site to power up and run a few job.
>>> The sysprog was fairly good he could use a screwdriver like no other
>>> sysprog and could basically get the machine up and limping to do those few
>>> jobs.
>>> That is until they bought a new machine that couldn't IPL the latest and
>>> greatest MVS. Also DB2 wouldn't even work.
>>> They ordered the new machine with their heads in the clouds as they were
>>> so cheap they didn't even want to pay for the latest COBOL.
>>> They screamed and moaned about having to put out a few dollars a month for
>>> COBOL and LE.
>>> When reminded that the old COBOL was Y2K compliant that pretty well shut
>>> them up.
>>> I was never so happy to leave place everything that cost $$ was met with a
>>> NO.
>>> They were also unhappy that their homegrown security system would not work
>>> anymore and they had to go to RACF.
>>> IDIOTS they got what they deserved.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> ...
>
>
> --
> Joel C. Ewing,    Bentonville, AR       [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to