Type then correct.  Sometimes settings don't stick unless there is
existing text having the attributes.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Martin Packer <[email protected]> wrote:
> And if you think that's bad try making your favourite slide or email
> editor keep the "z" lower case. Permanent nightmare. :-)
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Martin Packer,
> zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
> Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
>
> +44-7802-245-584
>
> email: [email protected]
>
> Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> Blog:
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>
>
>
> From:   "Joel C. Ewing" <[email protected]>
> To:     [email protected]
> Date:   19/02/2016 02:33
> Subject:        Re: Introducing the New z13s: Tim's Hardware Highlights
> Sent by:        IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> The recognized punctuation rules are no longer black and white where z13
> and z13s are involved.  The rule of always using an apostrophe for
> plurals of "non-words" is no longer universal:
>
> One rule is apostrophe "s" is used for plural for "words" that are not
> normally a noun; but z13 in our context is normally a noun, so by that
> standard the plural could be just z13s.
>
> When multi-digit numbers are made into a plural, it is now acceptable to
> use just "s" for plural, as in both 1990's and 1990s being in common use
> for multiple years in that decade -- again by that standard, z13s could
> be a plural of z13.
>
> And of course, if you want a possessive form, like "the z13's frame",
> then the apostrophe is required, which is very confusing if you also
> demand the apostrophe for a plural.
>
> All in all, "z13s" as a distinct machine type introduces ambiguity that
> could easily have been avoided.  It was not an astute choice.
>     Joel C. Ewing
>
> On 02/18/2016 07:57 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>> Maybe right:
>>
>> z13 is a single z13
>> z13's is more than one z13
>> z13s is a single z13s
>> z13s' is more than one z13s
>> z13* or z13x is one or more z13*'s or z13x's
>>
>> where x or * is any char including null
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ed Gould <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2016, at 3:30 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
>>>
> -------------SNIP---------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>> 4. IBM has greatly relaxed the data center environmental requirements
> for
>>>> this model, expanding the temperature and humidity envelopes. It's
> much
>>>> more realistic now to install the z13s in nontraditional data centers,
> or
>>>> even places that aren't really data centers. Platforms that move, for
>>>> example, or out in remote facilities. (In technobabble it's an ASHRAE
>>>> class
>>>> A3 system now instead of class A2.)
>>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------SNIP---------------------------
>>> Timothy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update
>>> -------------WAR STORY TIME--------------------------------------------
>>> I worked at one place that used a ware house type environment to do DR.
>>> That is they bought a new machine in their DC and disassembled the old
>>> machine and put it in the ware house.
>>> Some how they expected the old machine could do DR. Periodically they
>>> would send a sysprog off to the DR site to power up and run a few job.
>>> The sysprog was fairly good he could use a screwdriver like no other
>>> sysprog and could basically get the machine up and limping to do those
> few
>>> jobs.
>>> That is until they bought a new machine that couldn't IPL the latest
> and
>>> greatest MVS. Also DB2 wouldn't even work.
>>> They ordered the new machine with their heads in the clouds as they
> were
>>> so cheap they didn't even want to pay for the latest COBOL.
>>> They screamed and moaned about having to put out a few dollars a month
> for
>>> COBOL and LE.
>>> When reminded that the old COBOL was Y2K compliant that pretty well
> shut
>>> them up.
>>> I was never so happy to leave place everything that cost $$ was met
> with a
>>> NO.
>>> They were also unhappy that their homegrown security system would not
> work
>>> anymore and they had to go to RACF.
>>> IDIOTS they got what they deserved.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> ...
>
>
> --
> Joel C. Ewing,    Bentonville, AR       [email protected]
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to