Hi there, We bumped into an IDCAMS enhancement. Under 1.13 a LISTCAT LEVEL of a GDG Base name which had no generations defined, gave us a return code value of 4, which we could use either in the IDCAMS control statement flow, or in the JOB Step flow. Under 2.1, we receive a value of zero, whether or not generations exist, because the base does exist.
See https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.e0zm100/dfsmsdfp_V2R1_listcat_before_ipl.htm On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Ward, Mike S <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, we will be migrating from V1.13 of z/OS to V2.2 in the next > couple of months. Is anyone aware of any gotchas that we need to look out > for? > > Thanks in advance. > > ========================== > This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the > system manager. This message contains confidential information and is > intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, > you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify > the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by > mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing > or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is > strictly prohibited. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
