[Default] On 14 Jul 2016 10:41:38 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [email protected] (Ed Jaffe) wrote:
>On 7/14/2016 5:11 AM, Peter Relson wrote: >>>> Any idea how it will perform in a zIIP/zAAPles hardcapped environment >>> Poorly. zIIP is recommended for any Java-based workload. >> I do not think of the recommendation has having to do with performance, >> instead having to do with cost. (although perhaps there's an aspect of >> "hardcapped" that >> I'm not thinking of). > >What you don't know is that Dave is running a kneecapped 3-way with no >zIIP where each CP delivers ~9 MSU. > >We run a kneecapped 3-way similar to Dave's, but we have a zIIP that >delivers ~178MSU. It's 19 times faster than any of Dave's CPs and, in my >experience, one needs that kind of power to get decent response times >out of any significant Java workload. Would it make sense to make it a kneecapped 2 way with a zIIP? Are there areas where this would improve performance? Clark Morris > >IJS... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
