On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:29:38 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: >[Default] On 14 Jul 2016 10:41:38 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main >[email protected] (Ed Jaffe) wrote: >
>>What you don't know is that Dave is running a kneecapped 3-way with no >>zIIP where each CP delivers ~9 MSU. >> >>We run a kneecapped 3-way similar to Dave's, but we have a zIIP that >>delivers ~178MSU. It's 19 times faster than any of Dave's CPs and, in my >>experience, one needs that kind of power to get decent response times >>out of any significant Java workload. > >Would it make sense to make it a kneecapped 2 way with a zIIP? Are >there areas where this would improve performance? Are you assuming that in order to get a zIIP he'd have to give up a CP? That isn't the case. There are available processors on the box to turn in a zIIP. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
