Agreed, a better wording for me would have been "I would prefer it included an action hold rather than JUST a doc hold in this case."
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 3:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA On Thu, 18 May 2017 20:26:03 +0000, Pommier, Rex wrote: >I would prefer it be an action hold rather than a doc hold in this case. It isn't either/or. Sometimes it is appropriate to have both a DOC and an ACTION hold. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
