On Fri, 19 May 2017 08:37:00 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote: >On Fri, 19 May 2017 20:05:43 +0700, Robin Atwood wrote: > >>(2) is interesting. Actually my first thought was to use ASCRE to spawn a new >>ASID to execute the command but >>I have heard that address space creation/destruction is a major overhead and >>so focused on ATTACH. > >My first question would be whether you're processing enough requests, >frequently enough, to worry about the overhead. If you're not used that >frequently, maybe the overhead won't matter? > And, an address space created by fork()/BPXAS lingers after the process terminates (I've observed in system log for 30 minutes) so another fork() within that interval needn't start a new address space.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
