Yes, the point was taken. I am now investigating using fork() to spin-off another address space.
Thanks Robin -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Relson Sent: 23 May 2017 00:24 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ATTACH with RSAPF=YES As best I can tell (unless I missed it), the OP has not answered the question of whether they understand that after doing something to remove authorization from the space, they are OK with leaving the space unauthorized. If that is not the case, we might as well end the discussion because there is no way to do that while maintaining system integrity, and it is unlikely anyone would accept such a "solution". Walt Farrell has pointed out approaches that are conceivably OK. ATTACH with RSAPF=YES should be off the table. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
