If IBM would stop messing around with DB2 erly code this effort would not have
been necessary.
On Thursday, July 6, 2017 7:48 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
I suspect that Elardus was thinking of "delete the data set" rather than
"delete the data set name from the LNKLST set" which is just a data
definition.
FWIW, I think that the system will not allow the same data set to be in a
LNKLST twice.
The only reason one should have for "moving" a LNKLST data set within the
concatenation is when there are name collisions between the members.
You might want to look to clean that up as part of this effort.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
