Peter Relson wrote: >I suspect that Elardus was thinking of "delete the data set" rather than >"delete the data set name from the LNKLST set" which is just a data definition.
Thanks. You're as usual 100% correct. It is also not about deleting the dataset, but renaming it while that library is still in use somewhere. But the OP said 'have to reposition a dataset in a new LNKLST' which is somewhat vague to me, so I gave my usual caution. >The only reason one should have for "moving" a LNKLST data set within the >concatenation is when there are name collisions between the members. You might >want to look to clean that up as part of this effort. Exactly! It is about the name collision and re-use/re-load an incorrect member [from an incorrect library], that I also recommend that a careful look around or review is needed before you delete something. I also want to recommend that you stop all affected address spaces, then do your linklst change/deletion/activation and then start your address spaces. YMMV of course. Of course, z/OS is dynamic enough that you can do those actions on the fly without harming still running address spaces. Such actions are usually done on a sandbox if IPL is not desired or if you're in a hurry to test something out. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
