On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll state the obvious......
> Can this "massage it in Excel" be determined to program it to just update it 
> on z/OS ??

I doubt it. The actuaries tend to do a lot of what I consider "ad hoc
messing around" to look at things. Also, they tend to want to "do it
themselves" since none of our programmers are statisticians or
actuaries. I don't blame them for this attitude. I often have the
"just let me do it myself, I know what I want". Also, they tend to
look at data one way, and that give them an idea about a different way
to look at the data. They don't want to have to put in a request and
get it approved, then coded, before they can get their new view. It's
kind of like a surgeon doing "exploratory surgery". They can't really
tell you before hand exactly what they are going to do because the
goal changes minute by minute as they explore.

> Seems like that would eliminate a bunch of CPU cycles transferring back and 
> forth and storage to just formally figure out what the "massaging" is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom Savor
> Software Developer, Sr
> FRMS-SCM
> Fiserv


-- 
If you look around the poker table & don't see an obvious sucker, it's you.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to