On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:14:52 -0500, Walt Farrell
([email protected]) wrote about "Re: Dynamic Steplib and z/OS 2.3?"
(in <[email protected]>):

> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:40:59 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Dynamic STEPLIB has been discussed in these fora so often that I suspect
>> it's the subject of numerous RFEs.  I suspect there are technical reasons
>> that IBM has not rushed to provide the function.  Is the design of OS/360
>> such that any dynamic STEPLIB would be incomplete or have unintended
>> consequences?
> 
> Any dynamic STEPLIB functionality introduces potential System Integrity> 
> exposures, because some parts (modules) of a program may have been
loaded> from one library and others from a different, incompatible library.
Such an exposure can just as easily occur from a static concatenation
for STEPLIB/JOBLIB, so allowing dynamic allocation is not a significant
increase in such exposure.

It is up to the site's programmers to ensure that the load libraries in
use in a job step are mutually compatible.
-- 
Regards,

Dave  [RLU #314465]
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
[email protected] (David W Noon)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to