On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 23:23:15 +0000, Frank Swarbrick wrote: > >My personal wish would be that OPTFILE have an option to specify one or more >DD names that it would open, rather than SYSOPTF being the only name. If that >had been available we'd probably use OPTFILE(DB2OPTF) or some such thing. > Good idea. Best might be the list of DDNAMEs, although that could be accomplished by JCL DD concatenation.
>Of course that doesn't really solve your particular RFE. Sounds like you need >a new compiler option that tells the compiler to use SYSOPTF if present, but >only if the new option is specified. > I thought the objective of the RFE was to circumvent the 100-byte JCL PARM limit. Doesn't PARMDD suffice for that? I'd be inclined to reject the RFE. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
