On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:35:40 -0500, John McKown wrote: > >The only deficit that I see in the OMVS command is that it is what I think >of as "native" TSO 3270 whereas it should be, like SDSF, use ISPF display >services when used when they are available. I've more or less gotten used >to the "half duplex" use of the 3270 in TSO. What might be nice would be a >way, in TSO, to "background" a TSO command like you can a UNIX command. Of >course, I must remember that TSO was designed in the days of OS/MVT and is >still more concerned with "resource consumption" rather that "user >productivity". > TSO's single address space design invites integrity threats if authorized programs run concurrently. Would you propose forking background programs into separate address spaces? Would BPX1EXM be a solution?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
