(It's Friday; SPAM is above suspicion.) On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:41:56 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>I don't see any problem with the BYPASS statement except that it's needlessly >specific. BYPASS(HOLDSYSTEM) without the list of types should not only >suffice--it does for me--but also hedges against the addition of some new >holdsys type that you also want to bypass but overlooked in the inventory. > OTOH, if a new holdsys type appears it might bear investigation. >Coincidentally we're also working an SR for a different link edit problem with >a System Automation module. Truth is, as good as SMP/E is, it cannot overcome >packaging errors. > No, testing by the supplier should do that. But the cafeteria-style service allowed by SMP/E may make it impractical that a customer could install. And I know of a case (ISV, not IBM) where a PTF passed testing only because of a dirty target zone. The problem was first detected in the field. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
