On 2018-10-17 13:19, Clark Morris wrote:
Is the data set in the concatenation twice because a symbolic is used to change the name of none, one or both at start-up time to another dataset? If APF is changed dynamically, should the change affect both members of the concatenation?
I don't have the JCL for the job, but it's reasonable to think that a symbolic was used to specify all or part of a data set name in a situation where a data set is concatenated with itself. Certainly an APF list change should affect all relevant data sets.
-- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software International (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507 Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
