I really don't belive PDSMAN refreshes / adds or deletes libraries from APF, dynamic or not, I know 'it used to' update LLA IF the PDS was managed, this was back Y2K, so things may have changed. the 306-4 is I think related to the concatenation, you lost authorization due to the STEPLIB concatenation, can't prove any of this without seeing JCL, APF...etc
Carmen Vitullo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gord Tomlin" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 12:34:52 PM Subject: Re: CA PDSMAN and dynamic additions to APF list On 2018-10-17 13:19, Clark Morris wrote: > Is the data set in the concatenation twice because a symbolic is used > to change the name of none, one or both at start-up time to another > dataset? If APF is changed dynamically, should the change affect both > members of the concatenation? I don't have the JCL for the job, but it's reasonable to think that a symbolic was used to specify all or part of a data set name in a situation where a data set is concatenated with itself. Certainly an APF list change should affect all relevant data sets. -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software International (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507 Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
