On 9/9/2019 1:04 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 07:55:29 -0500, Peter Fatzinger <f...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

Mark,
  The 1M increment for RUCSA storage was not chosen haphazardly.  We understand 
the scarcity of below-the-line memory, but in order to provide the isolation 
needed to adequately protect the area we couldn't use any increment smaller 
than 1M.


I pretty much assumed that, but thanks for the confirmation.


  Also, in case anyone is unaware, beginning in z/OS V2R4 RUCSA is a separately 
ordered paid feature.


Youse wants to break da rules, youse gotta pay.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to