Tritus SPF; it is, alas, abandon-ware, but it is able to run ISPF dialogs that do not depend on TSO commands or TSO function packages. It has regexen, but the syntax is not the same as either ISPF or the major PC languages. I would happily pay for an upgrade if the developers would revive it, but as I understand it there are legal issues that make it unlikely.
If Mark Hessling ever upgrades the support of prefix macros in THE to be fully compatible with XEDIT, I may switch, but I would still retain TSPF for the utility functions. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Jeremy Nicoll <jn.ls.mfrm...@letterboxes.org> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 6:02 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mainframe DEVOPS On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, at 22:21, Seymour J Metz wrote: > FWIW the PC editor I use most is TSPF Transport Scotland Pavement Forum ? -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
