As I suspected, the manual is wrong. 

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Dana Mitchell [mitchd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 2:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX MVSVAR SYMDEF behavoiur

foo = SYSNAME
   ..................................................... REXXTRY on TSO
say 'Foo:' MVSVAR('SYMDEF','foo')
 Foo:
   ..................................................... REXXTRY on TSO




On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:42:30 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

>Even if you accept "the sky's the limit" for undefined behavior, there's still 
>the undocumented issue of whether it is permissible to include a leading 
>ampersand or a trailing period with the symbol, which is permissible in the 
>SYMDEF statement. Also, I'd like to see whether the following behaves as 
>documented:
>
>    foo = SYSNAME
>    say MVSVAR('SYMDEF','foo')
>
>
>--
>Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to