> I do not disagree > that IDNA is not a good start, but should we not go a few steps more to > layout a plan that would take us through IDNA(ACE) and into UTF8 eventually? first we need to get an ASCII-based solution out the door. perhaps by then someone will have come up with a convincing argument as to why having the ability to use UTF-8 on the wire in the DNS protocol (and producing consistent results with ASCII queries) actually produces a tangible benefit that is worth the incremental cost. so far, nobody has managed to do that. Keith
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Dan Oscarsson
