> > but due to backward compatibility and deployment issues, the ACE > > representation is the essential one. The UTF8 one is not needed. > > It is only essential to the past twenty years of activity, while UTF8 is > essential to the next twenty years. for some applications, ACE will be needed for the next twenty years. we can't expect people to upgrade their applications en masse. nor would this make good operational sense. > Managing a single representation of data is going to be the most important > aspect going forward. You know this deep inside. Gut feelings are often wrong, especially when they favor widespread and disruptive change. I place far more confidence in cost-vs-benefit analysis. Keith
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Brian W. Spolarich
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Martin Duerst
