> but due to backward compatibility and deployment issues, the ACE > representation is the essential one. The UTF8 one is not needed. It is only essential to the past twenty years of activity, while UTF8 is essential to the next twenty years. Managing a single representation of data is going to be the most important aspect going forward. You know this deep inside. > as I've said before, the time to move to a UTF8 representation in the > DNS protocol is when we upgrade to something better than DNS. Not necessary. -- Eric A. Hall http://www.ehsco.com/ Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Brian W. Spolarich
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Rick H Wesson
