> > hint: the cost of dealing with two different name representations is > > greater than the cost of dealing with a single one. > > No kidding. With UTF8 they only do it once. With ACE they do it twice. but due to backward compatibility and deployment issues, the ACE representation is the essential one. The UTF8 one is not needed. as I've said before, the time to move to a UTF8 representation in the DNS protocol is when we upgrade to something better than DNS.
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Mats Dufberg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Edmon
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Brian W. Spolarich
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
