Brian, I do feel that it is important not to preserve case, furthermore I believe that it is a major drawback of the DUDE draft that it could support case preservation. -rick On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Brian W. Spolarich wrote: > If the WG feels that case preservation in decoding is important, then 1) > it is not inconsistent with IDNA's architecture and 2) the ACE and NamePrep > can be modified to support it without adding too much complexity (beyond the > inherent complexities of case in general). > > -bws > >
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check liana . ydisg
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Rick H Wesson
- Re: [idn] Reality Check D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Martin Duerst
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Russ Rolfe
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- RE: [idn] Reality Check John C Klensin
- RE: [idn] Reality Check Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Reality Check Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Reality Check D. J. Bernstein
