Hi, From: "James Seng/Personal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [idn] Update Charter revision 2 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:59:26 +0800
Here are my comments. - There is no target for 'Requirements' in milestone. I think it should be. - I think RFC target in milestone should be identical to action items. Is 'architecture' in milestone denoting item 2? Is 'protocol' denoting item 3? Please clarify relation between terms in milestone and action items. - Nameprep is now divided into framework (stringprep) and profile (nameprep). Is stringprep scope of this WG? I think it is eventually yes at this moment but I'm not sure, so please clarify position of stringprep. Best regards, > The Action Item(s) for the Working Group are > > 1. An Informational RFC specifying the requirements for providing > Internationalized access to domain names. The document should > provide guidance for development solutions to this problem, > taking localized (e.g. writing order) and related operational > issues into consideration. > > 2. A standard track specification on access to internationalized > domain names including specifying any transition issues. > > 3. A standard track specification on an ASCII Compatible Encoding > (ACE). This may or may not be used in the standard track > specification on access to internationalized domain names. > > 4. A standard track specification on normalization of identifiers > for the purpuse of comparisons. This document may includes case > folding, map outs, and prohibited characters. > > Goal & Milestone: > > Nov 2001 Nameprep RFC wg last call > Dec 2001 Nameprep RFC send to IESG for advancement > Nov 2001 First draft of architecture draft specifying the > relationship between input methods, namepreps and zonefile > Dec 2001 Protocol RFC wg last call > Dec 2001 Second draft of architecture draft > Jan 2002 Protocol RFC send to IESG for advancement > Feb 2002 Architecture draft last call > Mar 2002 Architecture draft send to IESG for advancement -- Yoshiro YONEYA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
