> - There is no target for 'Requirements' in milestone. I think it > should be.
It is already move forward for IESG action. it is technically out of the hand of the wg. (unless the iesg bounce it back to the group) so there is no need for a explicit milestone. I will put a changes there tho. > - I think RFC target in milestone should be identical to action items. > Is 'architecture' in milestone denoting item 2? Is 'protocol' > denoting item 3? Please clarify relation between terms in milestone > and action items. some action items may have more than one RFC. > - Nameprep is now divided into framework (stringprep) and profile > (nameprep). Is stringprep scope of this WG? I think it is > eventually yes at this moment but I'm not sure, so please clarify > position of stringprep. Good question. As far as it stand now, only draft-ietf-idn-nameprep is part of IDN work. draft-hoffman-stringprep is not. How it goes will depends on the author. I suspect only nameprep will stay within IDN group and stringprep may remains generic or go to other wg, which may not be formed yet. -James Seng
